— Bob-a-job-alog-a-roonie

Floyds = my Dad’s late-nite burger restaurant name, before Pink Floyd

58 = fifties and eighties / 50s & 80s

“rock ‘n’ roll” probably was most successful in the 50s and 80s. Yet the two versions were very different. They had to be, as the first was the first. It never got to grow and mutate in the early days.

The Bar:

The “Bar”, everything is 50s, like Happy Days. Staff uniforms., pastel etc

On everyone else’s side of the bar, the public side, it is GnR, 80s.

Above the bar is a food menu, but it is a retro facsimile. Even though the names match up, the item above the bar is not the modern equivalent in the bar menu.

Bands, sticky carpet, graffiti toilets, all on our side is that. You can’t make patrons dress up, but decor will inspire, plus the glassies who are dressed up 80s. And trivia host. And DJ. etc

Behind the bar is young Britney Spears in a waitress outfit.

With Art Deco milkshake shakers

Um – a real bar, 24/7 with 24/7 food, St Kilda, drive-in (not drive thru)

Or a story about the real bar, and it turns out the barmaids are robots…

Read More

The fake burger industry is obsessed with the idea being vegan. It is philosophical.

What if it was climate change?

That is a cause that could save our species, rather than being about a philosophy.

The popularity of beef is causing deforestation – fact
Deforestation leads to global warming – fact

Shifting from caged chicken to free range chicken makes beef relatively cheaper – fact?
Creating fake beef from chicken should reduce the demand for beef!
And it would surely be easier to replicate the texture of beef by using another form of meat…

Two parallel worlds. Because either can avoid or trigger the tipping point.

 

 

Read More

We start with the stupidest man ever (D Trump) who said that chicken isn’t real meat.. see elsewhere…

That causes the end of the human species…

We then see three flashbacks:

Who made me? We see the human as a baby, with two parents being parental nearby them

Why made me? We see them when they met/courted

Why did they exist? With some it is just a shrug, no reason!. For others we see the good skill or lucky accident that kept them alive

Selected ancestors, going back in time, 1-3 of those above.

 

We learn that our personal selves are a lucky accident of fitness and lucky accidents.

Strongest in a fight / everyone else dies in an avalanche

Right back to when a monkey made a proto-human.

So, yeah, more than one avalanche? Throw in some tortured humour?

 


Trumph is the president.

This is satire, so you can say what you want.

Enlist the Cloud Atlas guy to write it, with input, and make it harsh and hilarious

 

 

 

 

Read More

This is a fascinating article
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/05/how-britain-can-help-you-get-away-with-stealing-millions-a-five-step-guide

Basically:

  • $20 is all you need to register a company in the UK
  • You can supply fake details, nobody checks
  • Money launderers worldwide use these
  • And fraudsters

A LLC company in England looks more legit than one based in, say, Nairobi. Yet it is so simple, I could register one from my home in a few minutes.

Entering fake details is of course illegal. The only person ever charged with this, unfortunately, was someone who registered a company in the name of the MP who made such changes in the law. And the poor bloke was hit with a huge fine for trying to be a good samaritan whistle-blower.

The UK government argues that checking compliance would cost too much (even though almost every other country manages to so).

This is symptomatic of what is wrong with the UK.

Read More

Trump tweet (chicken will never be beef) is the end of the world*, but what psychology led to it. from wanting to impress his Dad back to the stone age

Done in reverse, like Inception, boring otherwise

At the end a caveman does B instead of A, and it gives him advantage.

We see numerous generations of this, with many being survival of the fittest, and many being odd luck.

Strongest man gets most fertile woman vs everyone in the village dies in an avalanche except the village idiot

Every generation gets a genetic skill that demonstrably gives them an advantage in fittest or luck.

Inherits strength so survives fight.
Scared of ice so misses the avalanche

Everyone stops eating the cheap to produce protein, in favour of the expensive one. Rich countries take over poor ones, destroy everything to make way for cows (like Amazon destruction now). Climate change worsens dramatically. And because rich countries are totally reliant on tech, a solar storm sends them back to the stone age, back to the original scenario. And one wrong choice leads to our extinction.

——-

Time meets halfway

Time flows both ways (only 2 ways)

So what happens when this way, and that way, cross paths

The trend on our trajectory is from individuals to a beautiful hive mind.
Theirs is from hive mind to individual
Both are seen as spiritual growth.
When they pass, they barely acknowledge each other, but it is understood that mid-way is heaven.

What if midway is heaven, and only those who recognise it get to go?

And the rest have more to do

This could be one person, one consciousness, two parallel realities, one moving forward, the other backward, and pass at halfway. Maybe at halfway everyone gets a blip. And it could be enlightening.

spark / the end of the world

 

 

Read More

I can’t write drama, on the page. I’m especially bad at dialogue. But a crazy synopsis I can do, and I have completed a script. If I can pull this off, it could be the most complex and topical script ever, while being fun.

The first ever digital marketing thriller! And ticks many topical boxes:

  • Autistic heroes
  • Data privacy
  • The 1%

Autistic criminals hack the FaceBook database and use it to determine who are good burglary targets:

  • job type
  • car makes they like (sports cars)
  • overseas holidays
  • vote conservative
  • own lap dogs
  • have gym memberships they don’t use
  • watch The Crown

And then when said people are posting selfies from overseas, they burgle them. But it turns out there isn’t much to steal these days, not like the jewellery and big screen TVs of the past. Flashback to them hefting a heavy telly.

Then, taking it a few steps further, they start kidnapping the family members. There are moral dilemmas involved, including whether they should steal from them and kidnap.

Baz, a digital marketing expert, seeing the news reports, figures there is a pattern, and figures they are getting data from FaceBook. Because he is autistic, he see the patterns in things. And he is especially good at seeing patterns of behaviour from people who are good at patterns. He likes fractals. And he lives online, because that levels the playing field for him. Real world, not so good.

He then (with the help of someone who could be a side plot), hacks FaceBook, applies the same criteria, and makes a shortlist of the next target.

MEANWHILE

One of the victims is also a crime boss, who spots some clues and hunts down the criminals

MEANWHILE

Some other amateur sleuths create an online persona who the criminals are certain to target. They are vigilantes but not geeks.

COPS

In all three instances, the cops get involved and play the would be targets, in order to catch the criminals. They have to act as the sad rich stereotypes who are targeted (humour)

BUT

The crime boss has orchestrated the entire thing, and is paying the amateur sleuths, (and the cops??) and the criminals, to play their parts.

Why would he do that? Well, he is an artificial intelligence, who has time travelled back from the future.

And he pays them with the prospect of time travel (after proving he is from the future)

I’m not sure about the above. There needs to be an AI from the future, on a Terminator mission, but not necessarily the crime boss.

SUBPLOT

Luddites. They are ineffectual in general, but manage to interfere with this story. We get to see a presentation they make about the technological “progress” of the last 200 years. They may just win somehow…

SUBPLOT

Romance between a hacker and a Luddite. They are probably both gender fluid. And had only met online.

DEMOGRAPHICS

I forgot to say that the hackers are elderly. Elderly women. It is just a given, internal logic, that all hackers are.

CONCLUSION IS A MEXICAN STANDOFF

But digital. Everyone can screw everyone with the touch of a button, and they meet in a VR world.

The AI crime boss knows how the future will turn out, which he uses as leverage. But he wants to change one thing, and that is a some rich evil person dies during the kidnap or before the ransom is paid. An evil person who would use time travel for his own gains. And just happened to send Baz back in time, but Baz is unaware.

NO BAD GUYS

Everyone is on a righteous mission. Ultimately is becomes the “would I go back in time and kill Hitler?” That could be a fantasy subplot as well 🙂

But the Luddites accidentally cause everyone to have a happy resolution.

I might need to make some flow charts…

Read More

Due to some weird circumstance, everything people wanted switched to something they desired to give.

We were all suddenly giving food, water and shelter to each other.

And giving love. To, like, everyone.

Instead of wanting world peace, we gave it.

Instead of wanting drugs and alcohol, we gave it away to others.

Back up a bit….

In the current world, people take selectively, and we end up with the haves and the have nots.

The reverse is giving selectively, and we end up with the same situation. It just feels nicer.

What if…

Selectivity disappeared? (impossible, we are all flawed humans, and that’s awesome, otherwise we would be Scientologists)

Selectivity was based on need?

treat others the way they want to be treated – my kids would eat ice cream all day if I let them. (that’s want, not need)

Needs based philosophy

Basically, charity. Give people want they need (but don’t have), which might not be what they want.

But charity is selective, it is what makes you feel good about giving.

Measure

How to measure honest, desperate need?

If we could, we could assign our giving appropriately.

The method cannot be announced, or else people will game it.

We need a benevolent dictator who can see into the souls of their subjects and help appropriately.

Damn, that is the theory of god 🙁

Read More

There aren’t any. I rotate who I subscribe to, which papers I read. They are all:

  • biased
  • have agendas
  • are poorly edited
  • often have articles that don’t make much sense
  • misrepresent facts to suit their agenda
  • (and also) sometimes do great investigative reporting

I am currently subscribed to The Australian, and the anti-transgender reporting is appalling. While maybe the views expressed could have a degree of validity (as views), there is zero balance, and no interviews of the people they are discussing.

I also recently saw an article that claimed 50% of building costs in NSW are taxes and fees. Such an extraordinary statement got me reading the whole article, and right near the end they admitted that figure included GST and income tax on everyone in the industry. That is an extreme Libertarian view.

I subscribe to magazines and newsletters from across the spectrum, from ultra-right wing and Libertarian (for example, a magazine called Regulation), to ultra-left wing and socialist (for example Green Left Weekly). But I’m lucky, I can read between the lines and notice the spin. Most people can’t. Otherwise such publications couldn’t exist.

The best Australian newspaper is not in print, it is IMHO The New Daily (run by Super funds). I also like The Saturday Paper – but its sibling The Quarterly Essay definitely has a right bias.

Read More
All Tarantino movies are different and interesting. Most aren’t subtle, you can see exactly what he is trying to achieve, and that ruins them a bit – you see the filmmaking instead of experiencing a movie.
 
I loved the acting, story, settings, soundtrack – like all of his films. But this one didn’t work as a cohesive whole. I wasn’t emotionally invested in any characters. 
 
The story of an ageing has been would have been great as a serious movie, like A Star Is Born did it.
 
The Bruce Lee stuff, historically accurate, felt wrong.
For a little while the Manson Family were genuinely creepy and I wanted more of that.
The dog food was awesome. The tracking shots of feet got repetitive. The young female actor was brill, as a sign of the times. Brad Pitt is looking physically amazing for his age.
 
It was good to see Sharon Tate being something other than the murdered pregnant actress, but all we saw was an airhead.
This might be the last slowly-paced (like moves from back then), fun movie ever made.
Read More

I had researched in the past, and failed, to find out why a quarter of a cup of coffee (well, equivalent, I take 1/4 or less or a “No Doze” tablet”), affects me for 36 hours. I can party hard, sleep for a few hours, and struggle to sleep at midnight the next day. From 1/4 of a cup of coffee.

If I have one cup of actual coffee, sober, the effects are unbearable.

So, 2 things are going on. One is that I must be a “slow metaboliser” of caffeine, just like Ozzy Osbourne (which is how I learned all of this).

Ironically, Osbourne’s genes suggest that he is a slow metabolizer of coffee, meaning that he would be more affected by caffeine.

“Turns out that Ozzy’s kryptonite is caffeine,” Conde said.

15 percent of people carry two copies of the slow variant and are slow metabolizers.

That gene can be linked to more chance of heart attacks, but only for people having a lot of coffee (not me, I figure):

If you are a Slow Metabolizer then your genetic makeup indicates you process caffeine at a slower rate and, as a result, caffeine may have longer-lasting stimulant effects. Slow metabolizers may experience negative side effects of caffeine consumption to a higher degree such as insomnia, anxiety, and upset stomach.  There is also evidence linking slow metabolizers with an increased risk of having a nonfatal heart attack and/or high blood pressure with higher amounts of coffee intake.

The other factor is that I only take caffeine when I drink. Or, rather, the other way around. Caffeine nullifies my chronic fatigue, but I can’t get to sleep when on it unless I am quite drunk:

Alcohol has an inhibitory effect on CYP1A2 activity (the enzyme involved in caffeine clearance). Alcohol intake of 50g per day prolongs caffeine half-life by 72% and decreases caffeine clearance by 36%

50g of alcohol is around 3 standard drinks. And I drink quite a bit more than that. I couldn’t find any data on how more than 50g affects caffeine clearance, but presumably it makes things worse.

So, problem, solved, after decades of wondering. I am certainly not the only one, as it is just a factor of genes and alcohol consumption.

 

 

Read More