— Bob-a-job-alog-a-roonie

OK, it won’t be mine. Although I have one, the latest one, my wife is the early adopter when it comes to phones. Her iPhone 4 is way older than my 4S, so she’ll be the one who gets to upgrade – and it looks like Sep/Oct.

Given that Android phones have made substantial ground, I’m wondering if it is OK to just presume Apple will maintain superiority, or should I be looking forward to reading some iPhone 5 reviews soon?

But then again, we don’t know a single person with a non-Apple smart phone. And we wonder where they are all hiding!

Read More

Seems that the biggest problem with many Australians accepting gay marriage is the use of the word “marriage”.  Lev Cherkasski has come up with a great solution – remove the word “marriage” from the laws of the land. So by legal definition we can all have a “civil union”, and outside of the law we can call it what we want. So I can tell people I am getting married, and if they have issue with it being a gay marriage, then so be it – but the legal impediment is removed and equality is attained. And with marriage being a Religious institution deep down, it makes sense to separate it from State.

Why not scrap Marriage altogether? Why not leave religion to religion and have the legislature stick to what it knows best; Civil procedure. Under such a revision, a future Civil Union act would recognize a Civil Union between two consenting adults for the purposes of family custody, asset transfer, financial liability and estate planning. That is where legal interference would end. Should individual couples then wish to extend their commitment to one another through a traditional Marriage, they would do as they do presently, wed in a house of god in the presence of the almighty spirit to pledge devotion to one another for eternity and live happily ever after. Should a religious authority recognize the validity of a same-sex marriage, they would certainly not have a shortage of willing couples wishing to tie the knot.

 

Read More

We’ve heard a lot recently about Spain’s economic woes, so it would seem an unlikely place to spot the future of businesses. A future where workers are in charge & where CEOs are paid a more moderate wage. A system that looks after everyone fairly. A socialist spin on capitalism. And the proof of concept is already massive in Spain. As soon as I read the Spain’s 10th largest corporation (in terms of sales or employees) was a co-op, I was ready to be convinced…

  • Mondragon Corporation has 85,000 members
  • Founded in the town of Mondragón in 1956, its origin is linked to the activity of a modest technical college and a small workshop producing paraffin heaters.
  • 80-85% of the workers collectively own and direct each enterprise run by MC
  • Workers choose and employ a managing director and retain the power to make all the basic decisions of the enterprise (what, how and where to produce and what to do with the profits
  • MC worker-members collectively choose, hire and fire the directors, whereas in capitalist enterprises the reverse occurs
  • MC limits top-paid worker/members to earning 6.5 times the lowest-paid workers
  • Total student enrollment in all its educational centers in 2010 was 9,282
  • Largest corporation in the Basque region
  • Has its own bank,  Caja Laboral, with $25bn in deposits
  • MC has expanded internationally, now operating over 77 businesses outside Spain

No wonder the region had a separatist movement!

Full story at The Guardian.

Note that in the UK, the third largest privately owned business is also a co-op: John Lewis Partnership. They are primarily the John Lewis and Waitrose businesses, and they have 81,000 employee members.

It looks like all that we need is for large co-ops like John Lewis to be brave and expand into new territories. But at the same time, we need to be careful that eventually there are multitudes of co-ops rather than a few super co-ops that wield too much power!

Read More

In politics there are typically two types of government ministers / representatives that hold a portfolio. The reigning politicians have the cabinet, whereas their counterparts in the opposition camp are the shadow cabinet.

Perhaps there’s room for a third? A shadow shadow cabinet? Independent cabinet? Alternate cabinet? People’s cabinet?

I like People’s Cabinet. With modern technology it could truly be just that. We could make non-electoral votes for people whose voice we would like heard in politics, people with talents directly related to the portfolio they hold (which is rare in government…).

Currently the Australian government and opposition are failing to agree on the best “boat people” refugee solution. It’s mostly gamesmanship, and it’s pissing off the electorate. A People’s Cabinet could provide a sensible solution, a compromise to suit all, and because they have a lot of public support, they’ll get media time and they’ll sway politicians.

The People’s ministers would necessarily swear to have no allegiance with any political party, ever. And they would be unpaid and no longer have an active role in the realms of their portfolio. And they must swear that they’ll not in the future. Every industry has retired, intelligent, valuable brains  – perhaps the sort that TV shows bring on as expert panelists.

Imagine People’s Cabinet members like these:

  • Immigration Minister – is a first or second generation immigrant. Had a career in immigration related social services. Has written a book about comparative international immigration policies and gained a PhD for it. Compare with Chris Bowen, career politician with economics degree…
  • Foreign Affairs Minister – former ambassador to Germany. Compare with Bob Carr, who before politics was an education officer and journalist…
  • Community Services – former CEO of a charity that provided emergency accommodation for the unlucky. Compare with Jenny Macklin, economics researcher…

My imagined People’s Cabinet would undoubtedly form better solutions than the existing politicians, and could solve this mess.

Read More

With three weeks to go I reckon the final standings will be like this:

  1. Chiefs
  2. Stormers
  3. Brumbies
  4. Crusaders
  5. Bulls
  6. Reds or Sharks

Playoffs:

Brumbies v Reds/Sharks – I don’t care who wins, none are likely to win the tournament. For the Sharks it would be an away game, not helping them.
Crusaders v Bulls – Crusaders will have a home town advantage, but it will be a close and thrilling game.

Semfinals:

Chiefs v Crusaders – I can’t tell. Too close to call. History suggests the Crusaders
Stormers v Brumbies – Stormers at home for certain

Final:

Stormers v Crusaders – Crusaders to win in South Africa

Read More

Just back from the gig, and I’m listening to I Wanna Be Your Lover. If Prince had played that tonight, verbatim, it would have been legendary. I’d almost be happy with that one song, done right.

I have no problem with Prince – I’m sure he is a lovely bloke. But when you get that famous, I guess the machine controls you.

I’m fucking seething!

Well, kinda.

Almost every seat was $180. Some in the very back row were $99, a token gesture. And down at ground level, surrounding the symbol stage, were seats priced at $350 and $450. That’s where I was. And it was shite. And that was the consensus of everyone down there that I spoke to.

Prince’s concert was “in the round”, a concept I have no problem with. But for it to work, you need a round stage, with the band in the center, and the star working the perimeter. Prince’s show tonight had a massive directional bias, and half the audience were cheated. But at least the hard-done-by half of the audience could look down on him, even if they weren’t exactly facing him. In my expensive seat (which I would have happily swapped for a $99 seat), I mostly got to see the back of the drum kit. I saw a lot of the backing singers, they used the rear of the stage extensively. But I paid to see Prince.

There were screens to watch, but from my premium seat they were literally at a 85 degree vertical angle, and it was painful to watch them for more than a minute at a time.

Prince did visit the rear of the stage – I counted 5 times in 3 hours. And each time was less than a minute. In fact so brief were these rear-facing appearances that only once did I have time to switch my phone to camera mode and take a picture.

The music was excellent and faultless. But I didn’t enjoy it – I only remember two brief happy moments 🙁  You know when you watch the Grammys or the Oscars and they have a tribute performance, where several songs are merged together and the music is honored. Imagine that for three hours. It seemed Prince did so many medleys that I reckon only two of his biggest hits were played in their entirety, whereas we got to hear a single verse and chorus of perhaps 10. Every time one of my favorite songs started to kick in, it segued into another hit. With no visuals and only sounds to enjoy, I still couldn’t get into a groove.

I did note that he mentioned Australia a few times, but I don’t think he ever said the word Melbourne…

The encores were stupid. One occurred after a 20 minute break in which there really wasn’t much cheering. I’ve never seen such a false encore in all my days. The third encore was so long coming that I gave up and left, along with half the crowd. I wouldn’t be surprised if he played another song or two to half the audience, and even they had given up clapping long before.

Prince was very slick, but there wasn’t a single moment where (I felt) he connected with the audience. There wasn’t a single moment where he sung beautifully, or soulfully.

The crowd loved it (I say that based on the dancing and smiles). But cults get similar reactions, and that doesn’t mean they are good. There are seven fish’n’chip shops in Williamstown (where I live) and I wouldn’t eat any of them for free – even though it is my favorite meal ever. Yet they are all still in business, because most folk are too easily pleased.

The hi-hat drums… well Prince was mostly behind them, and at the same relative height. Here’s the best it got for me visuallly – and it was extremely brief.

Here’s what a reporter from The Age said about Prince’s prior gig in Sydney:

Most shows start and end as strongly as possible and, if they have to dip, do so briefly in the middle. This one was a veritable roller-coaster: one minute you’d be feasting on the hot funk of Jam of the Year; the next you’d be scratching your head at The Song of the Heart, Prince’s goofy song from Happy Feet. Or you would be getting Delirious and partying like it was 1999 (why does he so often cram the upbeat jams into medleys?) only to find him sliding into a teasing, unfulfilling read of Little Red Corvette.

Don’t get me started on the painfully indulgent 20-minute meander through Purple Rain or the fact that he kept us waiting another 20 minutes in the dark for a final encore of Peach.

Read More

Trudi just alerted me – this “Choose Your Own Adventure” type interactive story that we created way, way back in 1998 is still online:

The Trans-Morbid Adventure

I never thought that anyone found it, but amazingly someone liked it enough to make YouTube videos of them playing it!

Here’s an example death scene – from memory death scenes took up half the adventure 😉


As you enter the Tabac, you trip on a cat and break the monsieur’s chocolate biscuit glass display. He is not happy with you and drags you out the back, ties you down and sticks all the glass fragments from the cabinet into your chest while humming. He then puts a large tray on the glass with a large dish of cat food in the middle. One by one neighbourhood cats jump on the tray and each time they do the glass fragments drive further towards your vital organs. .

You can guess the rest.

Bad Luck. Try Again.

Read More

This news is quite bizarre, and seems to prove that in the USA the FDA is owned by Big Pharma:

The Washington Times reports that a new four-page proposal made by the FDA suggests that cholesterol (statins), diabetes, and asthma drugs, among others, be made available over-the-counter (OTC) to patients without a prescription. And what is the reason for this? According to the agency, too many patients are not getting their prescriptions filled, and many would-be patients are not going in to receive the treatments that their medical overlords feel they should be receiving.

Given that statins have a history of doing more harm than good, letting people self-medicate is very worrisome indeed!

Read More

Exercise can delay the onset of diabetes by boosting the expression of genes involved in muscle oxidation and glucose regulation. A new study, published today (March 6) in Cell Metabolism, suggests that DNA methylation drives some of these changes, and that they can occur within just a few hours of exercise, providing a potential mechanism for how exercise protects the body from metabolic disease.

Or in other words, your DNA changes to help protect you from diabetes – all you need to do is exercise. But you need to always exercise:

Evidence of such transient epigenetic changes is exciting, said Ling, but the changes didn’t last long: within a few more hours of the initial increases in gene expression, the muscle methylation and expression levels returned to baseline. This begs the question of whether the effects will eventually stabilize with regular exercise, she said. “If you exercise a lot and you make these epigenetic changes, you wouldn’t just change your [short-term] expression, but [in the] long-term, change your genome. And maybe you will be more protected from diabetes due to epigenetic change.”
http://the-scientist.com/2012/03/06/exercise-alters-epigenetics/

Read More

The pic says it all:

It’s called an ultralight metallic microlattice, and it’s produced in an intriguing way. The method involves using a liquid photopolymer which solidifies when hit by ultraviolet radiation. Scientists shine light on the liquid through a pattern. Only the exposed bits of the liquid become solid, creating a lattice-work scaffold, which is then coated with nickel-phosphorous. Once the photopolymer is etched away, all that is left is a 3D, hollow lattice of metal which is more air than anything else.

This stuff weighs less than one milligram per cubic centimeter, completely bounces back after compression, and is made of a repeating lattice. It has incredible potential for use as thermal insulation; acoustic, vibration or shock dampening; energy absorption and recovery; and electronic parts.

The video is pretty cool:
http://io9.com/5860930/watch-ultra+light-metal-in-action

Read More